Urbaneblog’s Weblog

Pop Culture meets Haut Couture

15 Worst Trades in Toronto Maple Leafs History (Part 3 of 3)

2013 UPDATE: I have refreshed and expanded this list on another website.  Check out the series here: Introduction, #21-25, #16-20, #11-15, #6-10 and #1-5.

Welcome to Part Three of the worst trades in Toronto Maple Leafs history, the final look at some of the darkest (and dumbest) days in Toronto hockey.

To recap, here is the list so far from Part One (which can be read here):
#15: Toronto trades Tukka Rask to the Boston Bruins for Andrew Raycroft
#14: Toronto loses Gerry Cheevers to the Boston Bruins in the Intra-League Draft
#13: Toronto trades Fredrick Modin to the Tampa Bay Lightning for Cory Cross and a 7th Round Pick in 2001 (Ivan Kolozvary)
#12: Toronto trades Larry Murphy to the Detroit Red Wings for Future Considerations
#11: Toronto trades Kenny Jonsson, Sean Haggerty, Darby Hendrickson and a 1st Round Pick in 1997 (Roberto Luongo) to the New York Islanders for Wendel Clark, Mathieu Schneider and D.J. Smith

And from Part Two (which can be read here):
#10: As compensation for signing RFA Mike Craig, Toronto sends Peter Zezel and Grant Marshall to the Dallas Stars
#9: Toronto trades Lanny McDonald and Joel Quenville to the Colorado Rockies for Pat Hickey and Wilf Paiement
#8: Toronto loses Brian Bradley to the Tampa Bay Lightning in the 1992 Expansion Draft
#7: Toronto trades Jason Smith to the Edmonton Oilers for a 2nd Round Pick in 2000 (Kris Vernarsky)
#6: Toronto trades Darryl Sittler to the Philadelphia Flyers for Rich Costello, a 2nd Round Pick in 1982 (Peter Ihnacak) and Future Considerations (Ken Strong)

And now… on with the not-so-grand finale!

#5: Toronto trades Russ Courtnall to the Montreal Canadiens for Jon Kordic and a 6th Round Pick in 1989 (Mike Doers)
Poor Gord Stellick… he’ll never live this trade down.  The Leafs needed a goon, and the Habs were interested in Russ Courtnall.  Apparently rather than haggle, the Leafs’ response was “Sure, why not.”  How did the trade work out?  Sadly, even worse than its reputation.  Kordin got 446 penalty minutes and 16 points in 104 games as a Leaf, while Courtnall gradually improved over parts of four seasons with the Habs.  He ended up with 82 goals and 195 points in 250 games for Montreal.  I know other trades have had closer margins in terms of the numbers, and ranked lower.  But this is one of those trades that just lives in infamy.  Plus the Leafs have had very, VERY few scoring wingers over the past 20 years, and barely a handful that were drafted by Toronto.  What’s worse, the Leafs traded Kordic and Paul Fenton for a 5th round pick for… Alexei Kudashov.  Wow.  Meanwhile, the Habs turned Russ Courtnall into Brian Bellows, who won a Stanley Cup with the Habs.  And Courtnall kept on being a decent offensive player (and I believe an all-star) with the Dallas Stars.

#4: Toronto trades Bernie Parent and a 2nd Round Pick in 1973 (Larry Goodenough) to the Philadelphia Flyers for a 1st Round Pick in 1973 (Bob Neely) and Future Considerations (Doug Favell)
There are bad trades… and then there are truly wretched trades.  This one falls into the second category.  Toronto had a young goaltender on their roster that left the club to play in the World Hockey Association, which instantly made him an outcast in the eyes of Leafs management and ownership.  Having played previously in Philadelphia with the NHL’s Flyers and the WHA’s Blazers, he requested a trade to Philadelphia.  His request was granted… and in his first two seasons with the Flyers, Bernie Parent won two Stanley Cups, two Conn Smythe trophies as the MVP of the playoffs, and two Vezina trophies.  So he was the best goaltender in the league, and the most valuable player on the back-to-back Stanley Cup champions.  He was also incredible during the regular season, posting a record of 177-60-57 in 298 games over six seasons.  Doug Favell meanwhile was a complete bust.  He was decent for the Leafs in his first season, just plain AWFUL in his second, and gone his third season lasted just three games before he was shipped to the Colorado Rockies.

And the Leafs failed to make a significant impact with the draft pick.  They had two other first rounders that year.  The other two (Lanny McDonald and Ian Turnbull) were stellar picks.  Bob Neely posted decent numbers as a defenseman, but after four seasons and change he was gone, and he only played 22 games after leaving Toronto.  Not much staying power.  Essentially, the Leafs received four seasons (3 of them decent) from a mid-level defenseman and two seasons (one of them good) from a back-up goaltender from a man who was possibly the best money goaltender in the 1970s.  BRILLIANT!!!  And don’t give me that 20-20 hindsight crap; Parent posted better numbers in his two seasons in Toronto than Favell did in his entire career.

#3a: Toronto trades a 2nd Round Pick in 2000 (Ivan Huml) to the Washington Capitals for Dmitri Khristich
#3b: The Chicago Blackhawks claim Steve Sullivan from Toronto via waivers

On the surface, the first trade looks harmless.  Boston didn’t do much with the draft pick, and Khristich’s numbers in year one (30 points in 53 games) suggest a decent hockey player.  Don’t let that fool you, he was AWFUL.  His second season (9 points in 27 games) was so bad the Leafs dumped him on Washington for a 3rd round pick in 2001 (which turned into Brendan Bell… who then, in keeping with Leafs’ tradition, turned into 17 games and 5 points from Yanic Perreault).  Khristich is the closest thing to a Maple Leaf player that I hated except for Mike Craig.  So on the surface, you’re probably wondering… a 2nd round pick for a 6-time 27+ goal scorer isn’t that huge of a risk, why is this trade so high?  Two reasons.  First, the rumours (which I believe) were that Boston walked away from Khristich’s arbitration settlement, thus making him essentially a UFA.  Instead of just SIGNING him, Leafs GM Pat Quinn traded a 2nd round pick to Boston for Khristich’s rights to “keep the peace”.

The second reason why this trade is so high was that, in order to make space for Khristich, Quinn put a young, small forward on waivers.  Quinn preferred veterans, and big tough players.  And the Chicago Blackhawks plucked Mr. Sullivan off waivers.  Steve Sullivan, since leaving Toronto, posted seven consecutive seasons where he scored 22+ goals and recorded 60+ points.  By the way, that would have placed him SECOND in Leafs scoring for five of those seasons, third for another, and somewhere in the Top Five for that final season.  Yes, I am saying that in those seven seasons, five of those seasons lacked a Leafs player named Sundin scoring 60 or more points.  Sullivan scored 303 points in 370 games for Chicago, raising his stock such that the Nashville Predators traded for him at the 2004 trade deadline at a cost of two 2nd Round draft picks.  He then scored 158 points in 150 games for the Predators before sitting out the 2007-08 season due to injury.  Just a terrible, TERRIBLE trade, one that confirmed the Leafs squandered all the resources they received (Sullivan, Jason Smith and Alyn McCauley) from the Doug Gilmour trade.  Imagine how good that trade would look if those three players were still in Leaf uniforms today, over 10 years after Gilmour was sent to New Jersey.

#2: Toronto trades Randy Carlyle and George Ferguson to the Pittsburgh Penguins for Dave Burrows
Most people will question this trade being so high on the list, especially considering the Pittsburgh Penguins were hardly a powerhours during the late 70s and early 80s (which ultimately led to their getting Mario Lemieux 1st overall in 1984).  Dave Burrows did absolutely nothing for Toronto.  In just over 2 seasons, he recorded 32 points in 151 games, and then he was gone.  George Ferguson meanwhile recorded four straight 20-goal seasons, and was even a strong performer in Pittsburgh’s first-round exists (15 points in 22 games).  But Randy Carlyle was the true gem of this deal.  He played 397 games as a Penguin, recording 323 points.  As a DEFENSEMAN.  In fact, he won the Norris trophy as the NHL’s best defenseman, recording 83 points in 1980-81.  He then went on to play another 564 games for the Winnipeg Jets, recrdong another 306 points.  Despite playing on some truly terrible teams that rarely made the playoffs, he still recorded 31 points in 53 playoff games after leaving Toronto.  Again, as a defenseman.

But wait, it gets worse (as if we needed worse giving up a consistent 20-goal man and a 1,000-game defenseman) is that the Penguisn were SMART with their assets.  Ferguson and the 1st overall pick in 1983 were traded to the North Stars for Minnesota’s pick and two players.  The players didn’t amount to much, but Pittsburgh selected long-time  Penguin Bob Errey.  And Carlyle was traded to the Jets for a 1st round pick in 1984 and Future Considerations.  The FC ended up being Moe Mantha.  Mantha recorded 168 points in 232 games for the Penguins, before becoming part of the Paul Coffey trade, which (after the ’91 Cup) in turn led to the trade that brought Kjell Samuelsson, Rick Tocchet and Ken Wregget to Pittsburgh (helping the Penguins get the ’92 Cup).  As for Doug Bodger, after contributing 167 points in 299 games, Pittsburgh dealt him to the Buffalo Sabres for goaltender Tom Barrasso (an important part of the ’91 and ’92 Cup wins).  So the Penguins turned Randy Carlyle into various components of one of the few back-to-back Cup champions of the last 20 years.  *sigh*  It’s very depressing writing about a team that knows how to continually turn over their high-value assets into new, long-term assets.  If only Craig Patrick had been Leafs’ GM… he would have moved Tucker, McCabe and possibly Sundin in 2005, rather than signing them to no-movement clauses after yet another 1st-round exit.

#1: Toronto trades a 1st Round Pick in 1991 to the New Jersey Devils for Tom Kurvers
And here we are… the most infamous trade in Toronto Maple Leafs history.  Now I know that earlier I stated that I ignore the draft choices made by other teams, because there is no guarantee that Toronto would have chosen that player (i.e. the Islanders choosing Roberto Luongo with the draft pick from the Leafs).  However, in this case I can argue that Toronto would almost assuredly have chosen a player of consequence.  Of the 22 players chosen in the first round, 17 have played in at least 575 NHL games as of August 2008.  Of the other five, two of them still managed to play over 100 games (and one of them was traded for Markus Naslund).  That’s a 77% chance that Toronto would have had received 575+ games from a first rounder, and an 86% chance of receiving 100+ games (which is more than they got out of Tom Kurvers).

Right off the bat, I will state this; Tom Kurvers was NOT an bad acquisition.  The year before the Leafs acquired him, they went 28-46-6 and missed the playoffs.  With him in 1990-91, they went 38-38-4 and scored 78 more goals than the year before.  Kurvers recorded 52 points and a respectable -8 rating in 70 games, along with 3 assists in 5 playoff games.  Quite decent, and demostrating that Kurvers was worth trading for, albeit not for a first round pick.  But then the next season, with just 3 assists in 19 games, the Leafs (on their way to a 23-46-11 season where they missed the playoffs by 11 points) dealt him to Vancouver for Brian Bradley.  Yes, that would be the very same Brian Bradley that the Leafs held onto for for one-and-a-half seasons, before letting him go in the ’92 Expansion Draft (for nothing) to the Tampa Bay Lightning.  So in total, dealing their 1991 1st Round Draft Pick resulted in 55 points in 89 games from Tom Kurvers, and 42 points in 85 games from Brian Bradley.  To summarize, dealing the first rounder gave Toronto 97 points in 174 games.  Of the 17 first rounders to play more games than the Leafs received for Kurvers/Bradley, the LOWEST point total was 128.  And that was from a defensive defenseman.  So by this math alone, the Leafs screwed up enough for this trade to end up in the top ten trades that make it possible for jerseys like this to exist:

And now comes the clincher.  The Leafs were bad in 1990-91… so bad that they were on pace to finish last in the NHL behind the Quebec Nordiques.  And Toronto was feeling the sting of Kurvers not working out as expected.  So the Leafs traded prospect Scott Pearson and a pair of 2nd Round picks to Quebec; the Nordiques selected Tuomas Gronman and Eric Lavigne.  However, you cannot say the trade did nothing for Quebec.  What it did was send three regulars to Toronto; Aaron Broten, Lucien Deblois and Michel Petit.  They weren’t exactly all-stars, but they were regular players on Quebec.  Their removal necessitated their replacement with younger, less talented players.  The Leafs even picked up another Nord (Claude Loiselle) near the trade deadline.  Now why you ask would the Leafs trade Pearson (their 1988 1st Round choice) and a pair of second round picks for three players from the worst team in the league?  Because by making Quebec slightly worse and Toronto slightly better, it diminished the chances of Toronto finishing last overall in the league.  Sounds like a noble goal… except the SOLE reason the Leafs did this was to avoid their last-place finish turning their draft pick into the first overall draft choice.  This would result in New Jersey turning Tom Kurvers… into teenage phenom Eric Lindros.

Before you say so what… in 1991, Eric Lindros was THE next great player.  Not an Alexander Daigle “he might be the next one”… we’re talking a Sidney Crosby “he WILL be the next one”.  Lindros scored 71 goals and 149 points in 57 games during his last juniour year.  He was so good that he was picked as an 18-year-old to play on the 1991 Canada Cup team.  A team so deep that Steve f’n YZERMAN never dressed for a single game.  And even though his career can be called disappointing, Lindros still recorded 372 goals and 865 points in 760 games.  Fortunately for the Leafs, their Quebec raids paid off, and the Nordiques finished last in the league, giving them the first overall draft pick.  The funny part is, rumours swirled a year later that Toronto offered a package including Doug Gilmour, Wendel Clark, Dave Ellett and possibly Felix Potvin to Quebec for Lindros before the Nordiques finally dealt him to Philadelphia.

But getting back to the trade.  We already know that it potentially cost Toronto the only true superstar this generation of Toronto fans would have seen (I like Gilmour and Sundin, but neither one of them was a superstar… the last one we had was Sittler).  The Leafs breathed a sigh of relief; Quebec’s finish and the San Jose Sharks joining the NHL meant New Jersey picked third.  And the Devils chose very, VERY well; Scott Niedermayer.  Niedermayer is one of the true great defenseman of this (or possibly any) generation.  He scored 476 points in 892 games with New Jersey, winning Stanley Cups in 1995, 2000 and 2003 (and very nearly another one in 2001).  He then signed with the Anaheim Ducks as a free agent, where he added another 157 points in 209 games, and a fourth Stanley Cup ring in 2007.  He also won a Memorial Cup (the Canadian Juniour Hockey championship), and gold medals at the World Juniour Championship, the World Championship, the World Cup (of hockey) and Winter Olympics.  The man was a winner on every single stage that he played.  The truly sad part… picking first or third (assuming they were smart enough to pick Niedermayer) would have given the Leafs a TRUE franchise player who would have spent 10+ seasons in their uniform.  Any number of players from the 1991 draft could have boosted the club’s fortunes longer term than Kurvers/Bradley.  You want scoring?  Peter Forsberg went 6th overall, and other options included Brian Rolston, Alexei Kovalev, Markus Naslund, Glen Murray and Martin Rucinsky.  Defense?  Scott Lachance, Aaron Ward, Richard Matvichuk and Philippe Boucher all played 700+ quality games.  Even a “bust” like Pat Falloon scored 322 points.

This was the trade that truly bottomed out the franchise at the end of 1980s.  Think of a 19-year-old Eric Lindros or Scott Niedermayer playing on the 1992-93 Leafs alongside Gilmour, Andreychuk, Clark and Potvin.  It would have completely changed the dynamic of the team.  And Sundin would have had some help keeping the team from being awful in the mid-to-late 1990s.  Lindros or Niedermayer might have been enough to turn one of those Conference Finals runs into a Stanley Cup Final apperance… or heaven forbid, a win.  And worst-case scenario, Lindros might even have helped out the Blue Jays.

That’s the beauty, and the pain of sports… the what-if’s, the could-have-been’s, and the wish-they-weren’ts.  But then that’s also the reason why lists like this are possible.  Every team has their share of glorious moments and tragic instances, and it’s unfortunate that Toronto has had more than their share.  I hope you’ve enjoyed reading these “Top 15” worst trades in Toronto Maple Leafs history as much as I enjoyed reading them.  I’m sure we haven’t seen the last of bad Leaf trades, and no matter what happens we will always cling to our hope that another Gilmour-type trade will bring the franchise back to life.  Go Leafs Go!

2013 UPDATE: I have refreshed and expanded this list on another website.  Check out the series here: Introduction, #21-25, #16-20, #11-15, #6-10 and #1-5.

August 6, 2008 - Posted by | Sports | , , , , , , , , , , ,


  1. Terrific post.

    Comment by Norte | August 11, 2008 | Reply

  2. Interesting list.

    I’ve gone on record defending the Courtnall/Kordic trade as a good one for the Leafs. You can read that piece here, and I stand by it:

    I also think the Clark/Schneider/Jonsson etc. deal was a decent one. Not necessarily good, but not worth the scorn it typically gets because of the connection to Luongo (who the Leafs would have never picked since they were still riding Potvin).

    That said, you definitely got #1 right. That one still makes my eyes bleed. The followup deal with the Nords was just the icing on the turd sandwich.

    Good series, look forward to reading more Leafs coverage.

    Comment by Down Goes Brown | August 13, 2008 | Reply

  3. Hi. Great post. I’ve got an obscure one for ya: In 1975 the Leafs drafted Doug Jarvis, 24th overall, then traded him, before he played a single game as a Maple Leaf, to Montreal for Greg Hubick. Jarvis is the NHL Iron-Man having played in 964 consecutive games! He won 4 Stanley Cups, the Selke, and the Masterton, scored 403 career points, and is today an assistant coach with the Habs.
    Greg Hubick played one full season with the Maple Leafs and then played the next three seasons in the minors. He then appeared 5 games with Vancouver in 79-80 and finished his NHL career with 15 points.

    Comment by general borschevsky | August 14, 2008 | Reply

  4. Good and fun post to read. I really only disagree with a few things. I don’t think the Raask/Raycroft deal should be on here. Leafs were in dire need of a starter with the loss of Belfour and they had at least one expendable goalie due to the back to back drafting of Pogge/Rask. So they did what they had to do. Raycroft had a bad year before they got him, but was probably the only starter they could have got in a straight up deal for Rask. Not to mention Raycroft set the team record for wins in a season. He was a bust but still a trade that needed to be done. 2nd, I don’t think the Jonsson/Clark whole deal is as bad as it was made out to be. Yes it seems bad because the Luongo thing,,but as said, Leafs would not have chosen him due to Potvin. 3rd. I agree with the #1 thing for sure, except your comment that neither Gilmour or Sundin are superstars. That’s very untrue as both were huge superstars, accumulating over 1000 pts each, especially Sundin, with the team had to have that success is the true sign of a Superstar. But still a good and entertaining post.

    Comment by AgentSands | January 2, 2009 | Reply

  5. Good post. Definitely entertaining.

    Just reading the comments and noticed one thing that I needed to rebuttle. AgentSands (comment #4) mentioned that Raycroft set the team record for wins in a single season, which is true yes, he had 37 back in ’06-’07. The only reason why he managed to do that was because he started 71 games that year.

    His stats were less than inspiring to say the least. He let in 205 goals that year with a 2.99 GAA and an 89.4 SV%.

    If those numbers seem vaguely familiar to anyone, it’s because Toskala is averaging roughly the same GAA and SV% since joining the Leafs.

    As for the Raask/Raycroft trade, I agree that it was a huge mistake.

    Yes they needed a goalie, however there were a number of UFA goalies they could have signed to keep their bright goaltending future intact; Dominic Hasek, Martin Prusek, Mike Dunham, Brian Boucher, Johan Hedberg, Martin Gerber, Manny Legace, Ty Conklin, John Grahame, hell even Wade Dubielewicz was available and he could’ve posted similar numbers.

    Worst case scenario, they should have traded Pogge. At the time they made the deal there was an uprising about moving Raask over Pogge, simply because he was further along in his development. Not to mention he was more disciplined in his pursuit of becoming a number one goalie.

    As you can see now, time told the truth on this one. Raask is now playing fairly regularly with the Bruins, where as Pogge is still working in the minors and no longer with the Leafs. Typical Leafs management moves.

    I just hope that the Burke regime turns this all around for us, and so far I am happy with the moves he has been making.

    Greg Ryan Sharp

    Comment by Greg Ryan Sharp | October 19, 2009 | Reply

  6. I also agree that the Jarvis for Hubic trade should be in the top five. And what about the deal that sent Rick Kehoe to Pittsburgh? That was bust too.

    Comment by TEd | November 4, 2009 | Reply

  7. Dealing away Errol Thompson was a mistake too.

    Comment by TEd | November 4, 2009 | Reply

  8. Swapping Tiger Williams and someone (Jerry Butler?) for Rick Vaive and Bill Derlago was an awesome deal!!!

    Comment by TEd | November 4, 2009 | Reply

  9. urbaneblog.wordpress.com’s done it again! Great read.

    Comment by Janis Becker | May 29, 2010 | Reply

  10. The fact that you acknowledge that Darryl Sittler was the last true Superstar the Toronto Maple Leafs ever had, and yet rank his trade out of Toronto as 6th overall, shows how bad this list was.

    The loss of both Darryl Sittler and Lanny McDonald through stupid trades is the reason why his fan never cheered for the Leafs since then. It is the same old song and dance from Leafs management, and the blind fans keep falling for it.

    When Detroit rolled into town and smoked the Leafs at the old Maple Leafs Garden 9-3 in 1983, I found a new team to cheer for…..one whose management has shown excellence and dedication to winning for the last 25 years.

    Comment by Z K | July 25, 2010 | Reply

  11. The best part of your list is it’s far from over. The Kessel deal will appear on it when the dust has settled. What a deal for the Bruins. Usually you have to suck to get back to back lottery picks but the Leafs are graciously doing it for them. When you’re a bottom feeder you don’t trade your first round pick for anything. Ever.

    Comment by Jason | January 28, 2011 | Reply

  12. Wow, you know your stuff. I thought I was a Leaf fan but barely remember Salming!

    Comment by Nasty & Brown | April 19, 2011 | Reply

  13. Probably this blog’s best writing on the web!!!

    Comment by Туризм | November 28, 2011 | Reply

  14. Kessel trade is definately one that will make your list someday but I did not see the Owen Nolan trade for McCauley, Boyes and a first round pick (Mark Stuart). Nolan ended up doing nothing for Toronto.

    Comment by Harry | April 1, 2012 | Reply

    • I’ve actually experimented with an updated and expanded list, but I’m still leaning towards the Kessel trade not being detrimental to the Leafs. Name one Leaf who was as year-in, year-out threat to score 30 Goals in the past 25 years other than Sundin. Clark? Too injury prone. Andreychuk? Too short-lived. Mogilny? If we’d gotten him five years earlier, maybe. Hell, we haven’t had a pure goal-scorer (besides Mats) probably since Lanny and Darryl. So while the Leafs overpaid for Kessel, I certainly don’t think the trade hurt them as much as any of the others on my list.

      Comment by JT @ Urbane Entertainment | June 11, 2012 | Reply

  15. I feel your shame. I never had any luck whatsoever with this kind of stuff, either.

    So relieved to find out I’m not all by my lonesome!

    Comment by Ahir Vora | October 2, 2012 | Reply

    • Misery does love company; that’s why the ACC is sold out every night. =)

      Comment by JT @ Urbane Entertainment | January 14, 2013 | Reply

      • Where are the Habs worst trades, those make These seem decent. Like

        Patrick Roy and Keane for Jocelyn Thibadault, Ruzinsky and Kovalenko
        John Leclair, Eric Gesjardins and a second for MarkRecchi..\
        Chris Cheelios for an old Denis Savard..
        Ryan McDonagh and Higgins for Scott Gomez.

        Comment by Bill Sith | December 19, 2013

  16. Hi Vistarini.

    I tend to write in one of two ways.

    The first way is I get a topic I’m interest in, and then simply begin researching it. My interest either intensifies as I gain more materials, or fades and I scrap the idea. When I have enough raw materials, I begin summarizing my thoughts and form them into a written product.

    The other way is “improv” writing, kind of stream-of-thought. I just start writing whatever comes to mind, without worrying so much about tone, quality or direction. Kind of a in-movement-brainstorming. I find that this gets some of the kinks out, and I can often find inspiration in things that come to me spur-of-the-moment.

    I hope this helps!

    Comment by JT @ Urbane Entertainment | January 14, 2013 | Reply

  17. I cant really find many as bad as the Habs….
    Patrick Roy and Mike Keane for Jocelyn Thibault, Ruzinsky and Kovalenko..
    John Leclair, Eric Desjardins AND a second for Mark Recchi…
    A young Chris Chelios for an ancient Denis Savard..
    Ryan McDonagh and Chris Higgins for (lmao ) Scott Gomez

    Comment by aemarchand11 | December 18, 2013 | Reply

  18. So why does Montreal, according to RDS have More players in the league that Nobody else wants than anyone else?? Gionta, Briere, Desharnais, Bourque, Moen, White, Boullion, Gorgues, Diaz, and Parros? Also, the site Hockey Inside Out loves Toronto.

    Comment by un canadien errant | December 18, 2013 | Reply

  19. Thank you for such insightful commentary. I’m just thrilled that someone with your level of intellect and tact is literate. Cheers, and thanks for reading.

    Comment by the1jasontaylor | January 15, 2014 | Reply

  20. […] Alyn McCauly went on to be a decent 2/3rd line centre for the Sharks for two more years, but then concussions forced him to abruptly retire at the age of 30.  Brad Boyes scored an outlier 46 goal season, and had another where he scored 30, but was otherwise generally not very good.  The first round pick turned out to be Mark Stuart and he was probably the best player the Leafs gave up in the deal, but it’s not like he was Scott Niedermyer. […]

    Pingback by The Five Best (Post-Gilmour) Trades in Leafs History | July 28, 2014 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: